050-895 Exam - Novell eDirectory Design and Implementation:eDirectory 8.8

Exam information
  • Exam Code: 50-895
  • Exam Name: Novell eDirectory Design and Implementation:eDirectory 8.8
  • Updated: Dec 27, 2017
  • Price -$48
  • Q & A: 70 Questions and Answers
  • Vendors : Novell
History
Located in Madison, New Jersey, player University may be a primarily residential field, consisting of roughly two, 200 students, faculty, and staff. The University includes 3 schools: The College of discipline, the system of rules faculty, and the Caspersen faculty of Graduate Studies. In 1984, Drew’s faculty of discipline became the primary liberal arts faculty within the us to incorporate a customary pc as part of tuition. This program, referred to as the pc Initiative, forms the muse of Drew’s omnipresent computing program. Drew’s IT services organization fashioned to support the pc initiative. As a result, whereas IT at player has more responsible numerous reorganizations as technology and therefore the University’s wants have changed, IT services at player have continually been centralized. Due to the centralized nature of the IT organization, Drew’s customers expect that computing services are offered in a very absolutely integrated, seamless fashion, no matter however complicated and varied the technologies is also beneath. Novell Identity Manager Drivers connect the varied directory services and applications within the system to the most identity vault eDirectory tree. Identity Manager Drivers receive notification of changes from eDirectory or the appliance; apply policies writtenin Novell’s DirXML script language or XSLT, then submit those changes to the appliance or eDirectory.Drew’s Identity Manager Drivers area unit divided generally into the subsequent categories:
  • User provisioning drivers
  • Application information drivers
  • Account management driver
  • Policy (loopback) drivers
Limited ability to support identity driven applications.
With no direct link between the University’s central administrative system and Drew’s directory services, the amount of information keep at intervals the directory was quite restricted. This made supporting applications that needed up-to-date identity data for users, like course management, helpdesk, or a forthcoming University wide portal troublesome. In most cases, Administrative Computing would offer a nightly file extract for the appliance being enforced, and Computing and Network Services would script loading this information into eDirectory or the application itself. Since the information needed by totally different applications usually overlapped, a lot of effort was duplicated.Also, the employment of nightly extracts meant that information was continually at least in some unspecified time in the future recent. There was no provision for changes within the administrative system to be mirrored in period in alternative applications. This limitation usually pissed off users, because it needed up to at least one day before changes in AIMS were mirrored in alternative campus systems. for instance, once students additional courses during the start of a semester, they'd have to be compelled to wait till the following day before they might access needed course materials within the course shared folder on the network. New workers toughened similar frustration, as data about the new rent might not are mirrored in alternative systems until the new employee’s second day of labor, relying upon when and the way Human Resources entered the knowledge into AIMS. This created it not possible for the new rent to perform routine tasks like log help desk calls on their 1st day.

Comments